Backdating in

Backdating in

Although many companies have been identified as having problems with backdating, the severity of the problem, and the consequences, fall along a broad spectrum. However, he only realizes this in January and so wishes to backdate the document to December. Thus, backdating can be misleading to shareholders in the sense that it results in option grants that are more favorable than the shareholders approved in adopting the stock option plan. Similarly, a person who wants to buy health insurance and make it effective beginning at a date prior to the current date. The event did not happen during the time period required for the benefit so an attempt is being made to pretend that it did.

The general reason companies

Typically, the grant date of the stock options is the same as the date of the board meeting. The other major way that backdating can be misleading to investors relates to the method by which the company accounts for the options.

Some of the more prominent corporate figures involved in the controversy currently are Steve Jobs and Michael Dell. Let's say that John now decides to exercise his stock options. The board formally grants the stock options to John every year at its January board meeting. Two parties in a business contract who explicitly agree in writing that an effective date for the contract can be made at a date prior to the current one. However, if the company granted options with an exercise price below fair market value, there would be a compensation expense that had to be recognized under applicable accounting rules.

For instance public companies

Notable companies embroiled in the scandal include Broadcom Corp. For example, if a seller had sold his house in December then the seller could have taken advantage of certain tax benefits. Stock prices change, however, and there is no guarantee that any stock price will ever be above the exercise price. Until very recently, a company that granted stock options to executives at fair market value did not have to recognize the cost of the options as a compensation expense.

Backdating legal definition of Backdating

Some of the moreIn theory this wouldHe also has no

In theory, this would appear on the face of it to be a reasonable request, as it is just a private arrangement between two parties. The general reason companies backdate options is to create a lower exercise price, which in turn increases the probability that exercising the options will make more money for the optionee.

This is a fraud on the tax authorities, a criminal offence and is likely to get the lawyer who prepared the document disciplined by his regulator and possibly also charged as a co-conspirator. This is not an agreement that could have been made orally.

Heinen for their alleged roles in backdating Apple options. If allowed, up to six-month backdating would apply as long as the buyer pays for that time period. Anderson and former Apple general counsel Nancy R.

There are some ways in which the lawyer can give himself some protection in agreeing to such a request but they are not foolproof. In such a case, tax deductions would be denied. Critics of backdating argue that the practice is difficult to detect and thus encourages boards and executives to use it to synthesize more creative compensation packages. Why It Matters Granting stock options to employees is a generally accepted and perfectly legal form of compensating employees.

Typically the grant

It allegedly failed to inform investors, or account for the options expense s properly. The insurance company may or may not allow backdating depending on the state where the person lives. These are questions he will probably be asked by the judge or regulator if things go wrong and to which he will need convincing answers. Backdating, in this case, may be useful as the parties, who have already begun acting on the agreement, finish the final details of the written contract.

Backdating the options is not. This is important to note, because the grant date is what determines the exercise price on the options.

He also has no way of knowing whether the backdating will be scrutinized by a regulatory authority or even a Court. For instance, public companies generally grant stock options in accordance with a formal stock option plan approved by shareholders at an annual meeting.

The other major way that